WELL, DUH!
What do you
think about this report
The article
begins with a summary of the findings:
“Weight control is not
simply a matter of willpower. Genes help determine the body's "set
point," which is defended by the brain.”
Well, DUH. Anyone who has been fat has, at some
point or another, directly or indirectly, been accused of “just not having any
willpower”, being “lazy” or “undisciplined”, or some similar pejorative. It
doesn’t matter how many hours a week you work, how active you might be, what
accomplishments and knowledge and skill you may possess, or what adversity you
may have overcome by sheer determination and hard work; the very fact that you
are fat is visible evidence that YOU HAVE NO WILLPOWER.
OK, so it's a bit of a relief to have the Scientists Good
Housekeeping Seal of Approval as quotable proof that we aren’t lazy and weak. Not that it’s going to convince anyone stupid enough to believe otherwise.
And the bit about the body having a setpoint is not
exactly news either. The problem, of course, is that when we eat poorly and don’t
exercise, we confuse our body. We mess up our metabolism. I seriously doubt
that anyone’s natural setpoint is 350 pounds. Unless maybe you’re seven feet
tall and built like a linebacker.
Dieting alone is rarely
successful, and relapse rates are high.
Well, DUH. Again, no news that diets are
unsuccessful. How could they be? For the most part, they require Gandhian
restraint, Spartan resistance to pleasure and comfort, and mad Fifi the Circus Poodle
hoop-jumping skillz. No one can sustain that forever, and as soon as you revert to the
junk food, the pounds are going to come piling back on, and bring friends.
Lifestyle change works, but lifestyle change
requires a lot of research and a lot of work that many people may be unwilling,
or lack the information, to do.
Moderate exercise, too,
rarely results in substantive long-term weight loss, which requires intensive
exercise.
How do we define moderate exercise, and intensive
exercise? I have no doubt that some people would consider my regime intensive,
but I consider it quite moderate. I’m so not into pushing myself to the point
of pain and exhaustion. I could never jog. I’ve never seen a jogger that doesn’t
look like he or she is suffering. Maybe they only do it because it feels so
good when they stop.
The article seems to define “moderate exercise” as
twenty to thirty minutes of walking a day, and says nothing about pace. I would
call that “light”. When I started my program, I walked about half an hour to
forty-five minutes a day at a fairly leisurely pace. Right now, constrained to
walking by my broken wrist, I walk an hour and twenty to two hours a day,
briskly, and without stopping. In both cases, I continued to lose weight.
Many Americans are not going to take the time to do
this much exercise, certainly. They may not have two hours a day, which I admit
is a lot for most people. I can’t always manage it either; this is
summer-schedule exercising for me. That’s why it’s important to have more
efficient forms of exercise available.
Scientists
are less sanguine. Many of the so-called facts about obesity,
they say, amount to speculation or oversimplification of the medical evidence.
Well, DUH. Again, not news to
anyone who’s been living the life. We humans like to have things boiled down
into nice little nuggets of neatly packaged information, and damn all those
pesky details.
But
the notion that Americans ever ate
well is suspect…“The meals we romanticize in the past somehow leave out the
reality of what people were eating,” he (Dr. Barry Glassner, a sociology professor at the University
of Southern California) --- C.) said. “The
average meal had whole milk and ended with pie.... The typical meal had plenty
of fat and calories.”
Yes. But the food was, by and
large, produced without the use of poisons; seasonal and natural, rather than forced
in industrial farm greenhouses and barns; unprocessed and prepared fresh. It
had more nutrients and probably tasted a lot better (in fact, having grown up
with a farm in the family, I know it
did). And people were much less sedentary. They weren’t exactly hitting the gym
all the time, but they were walking more places and working with their hands a
lot more. They were on their feet. Read Real Food by Nina Planck; it’ll open
your eyes.
Second,
scientists recently have come to understand that the brain exerts astonishing
control over body composition and how much individuals eat. “There are physiological
mechanisms that keep us from losing weight,” said Dr. Matthew W. Gilman, the
director of the obesity prevention program at Harvard Medical School/Pilgrim
Health Care.
I’m sure this is true. If
people are predisposed to like and be good at, say … math and not subjects that
require you to memorize dates; making up
stories and not taking apart and rebuilding stuff; or sports and not music … why wouldn’t they
be predisposed to eat more or less or be attracted to certain foods over
others? And why wouldn’t this, along with environmental factors, predispose
certain people to weigh more than others and perhaps have a harder time losing
and keeping off weight?
On the other hand, I find it
very difficult to believe that, barring special medical conditions, anyone is
naturally predisposed to eat so much more food than their bodies need that they
become grossly overweight. That, I believe, is learned behavior. I am certain
that it is, in my own case.
Americans are bombarded, on a
daily and even hourly basis, with confusing messages about having it all ---
plenty of money, nice things, good rich food, slender fit bodies, lots and lots
of fun. We are surrounded by manipulated media images of good living, which
encompass all of the above, and are made to feel “less than” if we don’t fit
the images we’re fed. You can’t tell me that trying to live up to these
impossible standards doesn’t affect how and what we eat, and how we end up
looking.
I believe that advertising,
magazines, television and movies hold up impossible ideals as reality, and we
buy into it, even on a subconscious level. One of my personal goals is to
reduce my own consumption of these images, which only serve to make me unhappy
and dissatisfied and, yes, fat and unhealthy as I struggle to achieve what is,
for me, an unrealistic ideal.
The question here is, what is
an unrealistic ideal? I do not believe that being slender, or at the very least,
less fat, is in fact unrealistic. I
also don’t think I know yet what is realistic for me. I think that’s something
you have to figure out once you find yourself not losing any more, and you
settle into maintenance. Check back with me on that next year; I hope to have more
personal observations to report at that time.
The article concludes with
this statement:
The
research is just beginning, true, but already it has upended some hoary myths
about dieting. The body establishes its optimal weight early on, perhaps even
before birth, and defends it vigorously through adulthood. As a result, weight
control is difficult for most of us. And obesity, the terrible new epidemic of the
developed world, is almost impossible to cure.
This conclusion is going to make a lot of fat acceptance
activists happy, but I simply can’t buy into it. As someone who has been obese
most of her adult life, but was an active, healthy child who merely thought she was fat, it’s my unscientific,
unstudied belief that obesity is difficult to overcome (let’s not say “cure”;
it is not a disease!) not because some of us are simply hardwired to be fat, but
for a combination of reasons, including:
- Yes, being genetically predisposed to be heavier than
some
- Being predisposed to enjoy eating and/or acquiring a taste for certain kinds of
foods
- Perhaps being less disposed to naturally enjoy exercise
(however, I believe you can learn to enjoy it!)
- Psychological factors, including protective reactions to
shaming; low self-esteem; and the need for constant defense against attack or
embarrassment
The conclusion I do draw from this study is that no one does a fat person any favors by
attempting to shame, mock, tease, nag, or harass them into losing weight, no
matter how benign their motives may be. These tactics clearly do not work and
are intensely damaging. The way we look should never determine whether we are “good
enough”, and weight loss should always be primarily motivated by HEALTH and not
simply the desire to look better in a bathing suit. (That’s a wonderful bonus).
Well, DUH!


